Albrecht Dürer and David Shepherd artwork
comparison
In this
essay I will be comparing art by two different artists. The artists I am
comparing are Dürer and David Shepherd. I have chosen to do my essay on these
artists because they both have a very unique and different way of producing
inspiring pieces of work. How I will be comparing the artist is by looking
closely at masterpieces created by the artists. I will also be discussing
certain details that I will look closer into. I will also be looking at methods
of producing the finished piece.
Albrecht Dürer also known as Dürer, was a German painter and printmaker; he produced
work in various ways including engravings within wood and watercolours. He was also
a part of a movement called, ‘High Renaissance’. High Renaissance was a visual art movement
that took place in the 1940s. He is also known as Europeans first landscape
artists. He is most famous for his watercolour painting of ‘The Hare’ and his
engraving of ‘The Rhinoceros’. These two pieces of his work are very different,
‘The Hare’ was done for observation whereas, The ‘Rhinoceros’ was not.
‘The
Rhinoceros’ (Source 1), this was created in 1515 by Dürer which was produced
out of a wood cutting with pen and ink. I find the piece to be rather
fascinating and interesting due to the appearance. The rhinoceros looks almost
abstract and small details have been exaggerated dramatically to create such
beauty within his work. It has been claimed that Dürer produced this piece
without actually seeing a rhino with his own eyes. I find this amazing that
such a bold and beautiful piece of work that become very famous was actually
produced by a description rather than observation. The written description he
worked from is above ‘The Rhinoceros’ picture I have got (Source 1).
Unfortunately, the written description is in another language and I cannot
understanding it. He has included features that are not on rhinos you would see
today. In his work, he has included scaly legs as a feature and also placed a
very small twisted shaped horn on the back of the rhino. These are feature that
are actually not part of a real rhino. This makes his art piece not accurate
but, it become very famous and conveys such extraordinary detail.
David
Shepherd is a British artist. He is most famous for his painting of ‘steam
locomotives and wildlife’. His work has been rather popular since the 1960’s
and, is internationally known as ‘The World’s Best Wildlife artists’. David
shepherd has always had an interest in conservation and animals in their
habitat. In his life he has painted and drawn lots of pieces that allows him to
share his experiences. He produces such lovely observational paintings and
drawings of animals in their own habitat. He has produced lots of work that he
has created throughout travelling the world and exploring wildlife. David
Shepherd is not known well for his portraits that he has done, which include
‘Queen Elizabeth.
His life as an artists and a conservationist
has be on a few TV programmes including; BBC ‘Man Who Loves Giants’. He has
also been on other programs such as; ‘Elephants and Engines’, ‘In Search of
Wildlife’ and ‘This is Your Life’.
‘Savuti
Elephants’ (Source 2) is an oil painting produced by David Shepherd. This is an
observation painting done from a distance in Africa’s wildlife using oil paint.
I find this to be a breath taking piece, due to the detail and how realistic
the painting looks. He has focused mainly on the centred elephant, I can tell
this by the amount of detail he has included on this individual elephant
compared to the rest. You can see the curiosity in each elephants face. You can
see that the elephants are deep in thought and are staring directly at David
Shepherd as he painted them from a distance. David Shepherd has set this out in
a way that allows you to see the depth between the elephants and gives the
impression of his work coming off of the page. His painting conveys the beauty
within each elephant and how amazing animals look in their own environment
instead of in captivity. He has gone into incredible detail to create the
creases within the skin of the elephants. He has also worked on a background
and a foreground giving the sense of space. He has painted lovely long grass
and has put very faint white birds flying within the sky.
Next, I
will be now comparing ‘The Rhinoceros’ and ‘Savuti Elephants’. In Dürer’s
Rhino, he has created incredible crisp lines with no mistake insight.
Everything is neatly order and no line is out of place. He has only used one
colour and gathered lovely detail but it is not realistic. No living creature
has a definite outline that surrounds there whole body. Where as in David
Shepherd’s, ‘Savuti Elephants’, is the opposite. There is no crisp definite
lines in a neat order, his painting is smooth and looks very realistic. You can
see the small brush strokes that he has created. He has used a range of
realistic colours and made this painting look three-dimensional. But, in Dürer’s
rhino, he has made the work look very two-dimensional.
The
backgrounds in both of these masterpieces are very different, in Dürer’s Rhino,
there is not much sense represented for a background. This is because; it is a
very two-dimensional piece. The foreground and the main focus of this piece is
of course, the Rhinoceros itself. The background is rather hard to distinguish.
You can see the rhino is standing on solid ground, but it does not extend much
into the background, it remains mainly in the foreground and just under the
feet of the rhino. In comparison to David Shepherd’s ‘Savuti Elephants’ its
quite the opposite, you can see clearly that the tall, wild grass is the
foreground and the elephants are slightly behind followed by the background of
the blue sky and white birds. In comparison, ‘The Rhinoceros’ is very
two-Dimensional and flat whereas, ‘Savuti Elephants’ is three-dimensional and
gives the detailed depth of space.
Next I
will be talking about composition. In ‘The Rhinoceros’ the composition is very
simple. The main focus of the artwork is centred in the middle of the work and
has little surrounding which makes the audience’s attention focus in mainly on
the rhino. Doing this makes the rhino look very bold and overpowering which
reflects what a rhino is. Rhinos are very bold powerful animals. In ‘Savuti
Elephants’, the composition is more complex compared to ‘The Rhinoceros’. This
is because of the three-dimensional aspect he has. The composition is more
interesting than the rhino but the positioning of the elephants means the main
focus is aimed at the elephants but due to the detailed background and
foreground, you lose a bit of the audience’s attention to the surrounding
areas.
In
conclusion, Dürer’s ‘The Rhinoceros’ and David Shepherd’s ‘Savuti Elephants’
are two very different a beautiful pieces in their own way. They both convey
such amazing detail in different ways of expressing wildlife. The most obvious
difference that stands out between the two artists is that fact that, the
artists have worked in a different stay. The ‘Rhinoceros’ has been done in
two-dimensional and the ‘Savuti Elephants’ has been done in three-dimensional.
Because they have been done so differently, it makes them both have such unique
stays of conveying an animal. I feel like the comparison of the two
masterpieces is very gripping and really makes me think about possible ways
that I could work to get different results to express a story within my own
work.
The
simplification of Dürer’s ‘The Rhinoceros’ is amazing and so unique, it’s very
interesting to know he produced that by a description and not from observation.
In my opinion I love the simplification of the two-dimensional art, it makes
the overall finished piece very interesting. Even though the rhino is mainly
two-dimensional, there is a feel of three-dimensional aspects from the use of
shade and shadow. I really like how the whole wood-engraving has been printed
in one colour. I think this makes a bold statement. It shows that
simplification can be outstanding and create an astatically pleasing piece.
David
Shepherd’s ‘Savuti Elephants’ is a lovely piece of work. In my opinion I really
like the marks he has created using his paintbrush. I love the mixture between
the smooth looking skin on the elephants along with the textured grass. I think
the colours are amazing and are very realistic. The colours really complement
the composition and the detail of the work. I love how realistic this looks, it
looks like it could have been a photography he took himself, it is so perfect
without a mistake insight.
Looking
as these two artists has given me awareness to detail and how I should take
time in my work to produce quality work like the artists. I have learnt that I
think it is better to work in two-dimension and I would also like to work in
two-dimension in my own work.
Source 1
Source 2
Bibliography


No comments:
Post a Comment